Didn’t we just get past a watered-down booze controversy? A series of lawsuits were filed in federal courts in three states this week, each accusing macrobrewing giant A-B InBev’s St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch division of selling Budweiser and other beer at a lower ABV percentage than listed on the label.
The complaints, filed in Pennsylvania, California and New Jersey, claim that up to 10 different beers in the company’s roster have been ending up on shelves with less alcohol than they are supposed to contain. The class action suits aim to remunerate consumers who got less booze than they thought they paid for, and are asking for upwards of $5 million each. The real damage, however, might come from the media outcry and customer backlash.
How the watering-down might be occurring is not entirely clear, but the suits are based on information from former employees at some of the 13 breweries A-B operates in the U.S. These people claim extra water is added just before bottling, reducing the alcohol in each bottle by between 3%–8%.
Considering that Budweiser has a pretty low 5% ABV to begin with, the difference would not be very noticeable to the drinker (an 8% reduction would lead to an ABV of 4.6% instead of 5%), but the savings (and therefore profits) for Aneheuser-Busch certainly would be.
A-B’s vice-president has called the claims “completely false,” but the cost-cutting methods jibe with the known techniques of CEO Carlos Brito, who ascended to the position when Anheuser-Busch merged with InBev in 2008. Brito is known for being ruthless in management, and prizing financial savings over quality control.
"Following the merger, [Anheuser-Busch] vigorously accelerated the deceptive practices, sacrificing the quality products once produced by Anheuser-Busch in order to reduce costs," the lawsuit said, according to the BBC.
The lawsuits come when A-B InBev is facing its first hurdle in its global expansion; the U.S. Department of Justice recently threatened to block the beer giant’s takeover of Grupo Modelo (makers of Corona and Modelo) under antitrust laws. A-B Inbev already controls more than 50% of the Belgian-Brazilian company, but the merger would give the congolomerate unprecedented control over both U.S. and world beer markets.
Perhaps the “watering down” lawsuits, combined with the U.S. goverment’s wariness, will put up a stumbling block to the unbending campaign of the company to flood stores with tasteless macrobrew and keep craft beer off the shelves.
If it was 100 BCE - 44 BCE, like your fellow countrymen, you would have reached for wine, but what would you drink today to give you courage, or at le...read more ›
The authors of "Bucket List Bars" name the best bars for celebrating St. Patrick's Day. ...read more ›
The bar is replacing the popular Russian beer with a cocktail called the Orange Revolution that's inspired by ...read more ›
In the glass, Elder looks like an amber jewel topped by a half-inch head of Baby's Breathe....read more ›
Voices of doom will have you believe we're on the eve of an all out craft-beer-mageddon....read more ›
The move is quite a departure for the typically blue-collar brand. Last time it tapped a celebrity to shill for its whiskies, it went with Kid Rock....read more ›
Any lingering doubt about whether the wait was worth it wafted away with the first sniff of the cult beer's lo...read more ›
February 22 is National Margarita Day. Here's how you should celebrate....read more ›
The barrels chosen for special commemorative bottling were among the last that Booker Noe himself hand-picked ...read more ›
Who put a face on the glass skull-shaped bottle, and why?...read more ›
"As long as our county has Shirley Temple, we will be all right." -Franklin Delano Roosevelt...read more ›
Unspecified terrorist threats prompted Bud's parent company to put the kibosh on its popular Olympic party, Cl...read more ›